[Snort-devel] R: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!?
risso at ...157...
Tue Dec 12 10:53:31 EST 2000
I do not agree with you.
Partially supported by Ms Research means that we got:
- 1 Dell workstation
I *strongly* suggest to ask someone before opening your mouth.
PS As Loris said, we sent an e-mail to tcpdump-workers asking for that. We
were really surprised by the poor performances of BSD. Anyway, no one
answered. So, please...
----- Original Message -----
From: <opentrax at ...156...>
To: <dr at ...40...>
Cc: <tcpdump-workers at ...142...>; <ethereal-dev at ...143...>;
<snort-devel at lists.sourceforge.net>; <freebsd-hackers at ...147...>;
<tech at ...76...>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:36 PM
Subject: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo
> On 7 Dec, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
> > (Hurm.... Wintendo outperforming unix???!?? Something's
> > improper about this, and it ought to be fixed... :-)
> > Comments? Other OS numbers: more recent
> > FreeBSD versions? Solaris? Tru64? Optimization
> > patches? Can those OO MSDN lobotomies actually
> > be good things? Hurm... The Italian gauntlet has
> > been thrown down.... --dr :-)
> > url: http://netgroup-serv.polito.it/winpcap/docs/performance.htm
> I'm not sure if we could find someone of this caliber to
> run the test again. For once I must agree with Mike Smith ;-)
> Clearly the page:
> says, "partially sponsored by MicroSoft Research".
> IMHO, it bait -- bad bait at that. IMO, M$ has found
> some hole in the FreeBSD kernel and is intending to expose it.
> Although I suspect the hole's been cleaned up by now by core.
> If Terry Lambert can chimes in, I know we might get some
> real answers. I'm not convinced by this M$ agent.
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev at ...143...
More information about the Snort-devel